PERU fishing with guts to report…
Fuentes de todo crédito indicaron a PERUPESQUERO, que Rolando Machado Sandoval, apoderado de su hermano Guillermo, accionista mayoritario de Pesquera Mar, vendría impulsando la venta de sus cuotas de pesca, lo que ha despertado el interés en diversas empresas pesqueras, cuyos representantes legales ya vienen haciendo números y buscando la manera de sacar de carrera a los abogados, amparándose en el absurdo argumento de Produce, “esas cuotas ya no le pertenece a Pesquera Mar porque el Estado ya les pagó”.
It is important to note that these quotas "are offering" being distributed doubled and even tripled in the form of illegal others in which there were even political interference by the previous government, and we do not doubt that there remains this palatial pressure as well as the Congress and Produce, whose Attorney despite knowing that the Innovativa Injunction prescribed and RD 107-2005-PRODUCE, lapsed after the Supreme Executive, negating the RD 253-PRODUCE and others born of it, besides the RD 509-2003-PRODUCE, deaf, blind and mute is maintained. The truth is that as well as the right to attend him Pesquera Mar to recover their fees, increases in them should also be included.,es
Among those interested in acquiring those quotas the most important Angellini Group, fisheries of Chile, challenged by interference in the fisheries policy of the country was and be the driver number one Longueira Law, besides the attempt to interfere with the decision of the it has, around the maritime problem he had with Peru. Why not reach a good agreement only know the players, it is no secret that this group is the largest predator of our resources invading maritime jurisdiction, that is a latent threat to the Peruvian fishing.,es
Another interested, would be the lawyer Juan Monroy, questioned for his staunch defense for Dionisio Romero, in the process it had with the SUNAT, as the Banco de Credito BCP would have declared the defense costs the employer as a deductible payment income tax, in good Christian meant that the State indirectly pay the costs of a "leguleyesca" defense, framed at the meeting of Romero and Montesinos by HAYDUK case.,es
However it is known that Monroy after defending Consorcio Carolina, went to practice advocacy on behalf of Montero Saavedra and Luis Ventura Ulloa, General Manager, would also be eager to acquire such shares, same as could border the 188 million dollars, and although minority shareholder (Montero Saavedra brothers), negotiated "their share" does not relieve that others do the same. Before "supply and demand" Produce should first obey the command of PJ and once in the hand of the owners re re renegotiate its long-awaited quotas.,es
Pesquera Mar quotas not resemble the tax deduction at the time defended Monroy, and wanting to acquire them amid "legal rabbits" is to accept them and be complicit in the illegal.
